Back to Squawk list
  • 22

Airport jetbridges not long enough to reach plane from terminal

Aggiunto
 
Monroe Regional Airport (KMLU) officials learned Tuesday passenger loading and unloading bridges at the new $36 million terminal are not being able to connect to airplanes....Your tax dollars at work. (www.thenewsstar.com) Altro...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


robot40
Joe Daileda 0
Wonderful. Why don't we have government do more for us--like running (or was that ruining) healthcare, etc.
sheka
mark tufts 0
i agree with you boyd and then make them pay for their mistakes
WALLACE24
WALLACE24 0
OOP! PAY UP TAXPAYER.
bishops90
Sounds more like a design problem. The Architects or Engineers must've miscalculated the length needed based on where the aircraft would have to park and where the doors on the aircraft are located. The Manufacturer of the jet bridges would have all the relevant specs and dimensions. I doubt seriously there could be such an error during construction. Door openings etc are pretty fixed dimensions in construction like that. If I'm not mistaken those jet bridges are pretty modular, so they should be able to add a section to them without it being a HUGE deal. PITA for sure, but not huge.

[This poster has been suspended.]

onceastudentpilot
and just think, it was a baggage handler that probably figured it out.....while everyone else was running around panicing and trying figure out how they were going to get the passengers off the arriving flights he/she stood there for a moment and said "why don't they just pull the plane closer".
preacher1
preacher1 0
Do you mean that COMMON SENSE AND PRACTICALITY actually prevailed here????????????lol
StymieHo
Well that's just funny.
linbb
linbb 0
Great the planners were hard at work on this one I wonder what else they missed? Doors to the building? Roof over it that doesnt leak? Who knows but the inspectors and others should have known from the start what was required and never have had this happen for any reason. Fire everyone that had anything to do with the planning of this.
indy2001
indy2001 0
I'm glad it was something that was easy to correct. But the comments on the original web site are absolutely amazing. They include everything from Blame Obama or Bush (your choice), it's a grab for our individual freedoms by the TSA, the local politicians' ineptness, and on and on and on. Funny in a way, but also pretty pathetic and sad.
kayjay58
Now lets see...... was that 69 or 96 feet?
jimquinndallas
Jim Quinn 0
I would think that the airport consultants/design engineers are sweating bullets on this one, as they should be.
navydoc192
Well, Someone sure screwed up!

Accedi

Non hai un account? Registrati adesso (è gratis) per usufruire di funzioni personalizzate, allarmi voli e molto altro!
Sapevi che il tracking dei voli di FlightAware è supportato dalla pubblicità?
Puoi aiutarci a mantenere FlightAware gratuito accettando gli annunci pubblicitari di FlightAware.com. Ci impegniamo per far sì che i nostri annunci siano pertinenti e discreti per offrire la migliore esperienza. Aggiungere gli annunci ammessi su FlightAware è facile e veloce oppure puoi prendere in considerazione i nostri account premium.
Ignora