Tutti
← Back to Squawk list
FAA romance led to $970 million contract award, 3,300-percent increase in air traffic control errors
A recent spike in air traffic control errors is likely attributable to a change in the Federal Aviation Administration’s chosen contractor for training air traffic controllers, The Daily Caller has learned. That change was likely the result of an government contracting shuffle orchestrated by an FAA official and her lover — a former FAA official who worked for Raytheon at the time the contract was awarded. Raytheon won the contract, worth nearly $1 billion (dailycaller.com) Altro...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
I like the old saying, "The FAA is not happy until we are not happy".
Is this really how industry and government work together? Wow. First LightSquared, now this. Well point me to someone important in DC in need of a good bangin so I can pave my drvieway with gold.
Unless things have changed the FAA does not control any airspace above FL600, (60,000ft).
Where did the information in the article get the idea that enroute centers control goes
up to 100,000 feet.
If this fact is wrong how correctis some of the other information in the article?
Where did the information in the article get the idea that enroute centers control goes
up to 100,000 feet.
If this fact is wrong how correctis some of the other information in the article?
Ron, the FAA does not recognize a CTO obtained at what they call a "trade school" (Advanced ATC, Link, etc.) as having any special value. They prefer CTI endorsements from CTI schools. The CTI program was recently internally evaluated, and you can read the report on faa.gov.
Gee, some folks are a bit touchy. My intention was to focus on the positive aspects of ATC rather than the banner headline that implied the sky was falling because of a 3300 percent increase in errors. I wanted to put into perspective that there are great controllers out there and they should not be painted by the negative perspective in this article. I strongly disagree with your assessment that only level 5 facilities generate the best controllers. In my opinion, these type facilities generally scare away the non-professional pilots, use lots of canned procedures and spread the workload out over a greater number of controllers. Generally facilities like (but not limited to) those I mentioned have to give more assistance to occasional pilots and mix in heavy iron pilots. When one is in IMC, one hopes their controller is not merely adequate.
Boy, am I glad I retired from ATC 11 years ago. I guess I'll have to really keep my ears open when I am in the cockpit now more than ever. There are ATC schools where students gain actual experience and CTO's before graduation. I would think the FAA would be grabbing up these people as soon as they graduate.